There were lots of things last
week that might have made me feel a little depressed, but being reminded I was an ‘old
man’ wasn’t one of them. In fact, the reverse was true and we had a chuckle
about her comment, which proved a source of amusement throughout the evening. That
said, anxiety and depression for all kinds of reasons seem to be rising at an alarming
rate. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) recently published an
interim report of their independent review into mental health conditions. It’s
an interesting, if a somewhat long read, have a look here. I found it a fascinating
account.
It is clear that there has been a
rise in the numbers of people experiencing anxiety and depression and psychological
distress over the last two decades. This rise is particularly prevalent in
young people and young adults. There has been an epidemiological shift too.
Historically, the evidence showed that people experienced these common mental
health problems in midlife, more so than when folk were younger. Today the
situation is reversed. It is younger people rather than those in their 40s who report
higher levels of distress. It’s a trend that predates the Covid 19 pandemic uptick in mental health diagnoses, and can be traced back to starting in the 2010
years.
Interestingly, it is the common mental
illness and distress that seems to be on the rise. Rates of people experiencing
severe mental illness, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and other
serious conditions seemed to have remained stable. The exception appears to be
eating disorders where prevalence rates have risen (again with younger people).
However, whatever the severity of the mental health problem, the impact upon
the individual and the wider society can be challenging and disruptive.
What is important in all cases, is
that for the individual, their experience of distress or poor mental health,
will be real. All providers of care need to understand that individual
experience, even where the person’s presentation doesn’t fit into a clearly defined
diagnostic category. This is not a new concept. Professor Sue McAndrew and I have
published a number of papers that explore the impact on individuals where a person’s
lived experience is ignored.
Last Monday I visited one of our
Early Intervention Services. As always, it was an informative and interesting
afternoon. Talking to my colleagues, it was absolutely clear that intervening
early, and particularly with people under the age of 35, helped ensure that
many individuals don’t go on to have a lifetime’s engagement with secondary mental
health care. It is an approach that the DHSC report makes clear requires
further investment. Again interestingly,
the report also tackles what at times, are perceived to be increases in the prevalence
of ADHD. Often both politicians and the public share this perception. The
evidence, however, is clear. Epidemiologically, over the last 10 years, ADHD prevalence
rates have remained stable. What is different is a substantial change in the recognition
of the diagnosis. Probably more importantly, is the link of a diagnosis and
access to clinical services and disability benefits such as personal independence
payments (PIP). Last week it was reported that every day 1000 new individuals are
claiming PIP. That is each and every day. Think about that for a moment.
Such a situation is not
sustainable or desirable. There is no date agreed for when the final DHSC report
is to be published. I hope I’m not too much older before it is
finally published. I also hope that it will contain strong, evidence-based and affordable
recommendations as to how we change the current situation.
Later this morning Jane and I
will be attending our church Harvest Festival. It is one of my favourite
services of the year. I may indeed be an ‘old man’, but I will enjoy
singing the familiar hymns first heard when I was a school boy! It is a service
that always brings a smile to my lips, although I might just check them before
I go.

No comments:
Post a Comment