This week’s blog comes from a small village in the mountains of Portugal. It’s a beautiful place called Monte Frio. I’m here as a guest of my childhood friend Keith and his lovely wife Ana. Like me, Keith is retired. He has the best of both worlds, an apartment in Matosinhos, Porto, near the sea and a house up here in the mountains. We both love music, and we both have large collections of musical instruments – Keith’s collection is more eclectic than mine. Mine is mainly dominated by famous name guitars (Fender, Martin, Gibson and so on). J doesn’t share my passion for collecting musical instruments (how many guitars does a man need?).
The last time I was here in
Portugal, was December 2019. I presented a keynote paper at a mental health
conference. It was a stay that I really enjoyed and I promised I would return
the following year. Little did we know what was coming to the world in 2020.
Covid-19 reached Portugal in March 2020; in the UK it was February of the same
year.
Many readers will know that Portugal
is part of the Iberian Peninsula and is famous for its beaches, port and great food.
Possibly some people will have heard of their most famous football player,
Cristiano Ronaldo. What is probably less well known is that Portugal has a very
good healthcare system. In world rankings (supplied by Numbeo) Portugal ranks
24th – the UK, 15th. Top country in this index is Taiwan,
something I wrote about earlier in the year. Last year’s World Index of
Healthcare Innovation, an index based on measuring quality, choice, science and
technology and financial sustainability, ranked Portugal 22nd. The
UK was 10th. Strangely Taiwan is not part of this index.
Actually, I have never been a
great fan of league tables. Both the league tables above do little to ensure
that different health care systems are comparable. More importantly, such
metrics tend to look only at illness services and not at measuring how the
social determinates of good health and well being are addressed. And that’s
where I’m at in my thinking. It’s possible to have the best acute medical
services in the world, and we need them of course, but if we could do more to
prevent ill health, then the world would be a better place.
So, as I’m in Portugal, let me
provide you with an example or two of what I mean. Here there is a universal
and publicly-funded health service. It’s called Servico Nacional de Saúde
(SNS) – it is similar to what we think of as our NHS in the UK. As in the UK,
most services are completely free to all Portuguese citizens. There are some
charges called ‘taxas moderadoras’ which are not there to help pay for
the provision of health care, but to stop people accessing services that they
don’t need. If you visit your GP, you pay a fee of about £4.50. To go to your
local A&E department as a non-emergency presentation, it’s £13.50. Like in
the UK, you will need to pay for your prescriptions to be filled (unless like
me, you are over the age of 65). Now then, here’s a thought, what about if we
introduced these charges to out NHS. I’m sure it would make a difference to the
ever increasing urgent and emergency care demands. I know it’s an idea fraught
with issues of how to protect the truly vulnerable, but goodness I like it.
Like many countries, cancer,
cardiovascular diseases and respiratory conditions are the most concerning issues
in Portugal. Reducing the risk of
experiencing one of these conditions revolves around addressing both health
inequality factors and life choices. My friend Keith is one of the 17% of
people in Portugal who continue to smoke tobacco. He is a health care
professional and understands the harm smoking has on an individual health.
Internationally, smoking remains the number one preventable cause of death. The
World Health Organisation report that it kills more than 8 million people a
year, including 1.2 million deaths of people exposed to second-hand smoke. Smoking
related deaths and illness are the number one preventable health care problem. Interestingly,
last week the renowned Health Foundation, published a survey that
observed only 46% of people thought the UK government were doing enough to
reduce the harm caused by smoking. There is another health aspect to smoking
that is nothing directly do with smoking, but is just as damaging. It is the economic
impact. A packet of 20 cigarettes in the UK cost between £10 – £16.50. That is
a lot of money to get diverted from household spend and, in many circumstances,
it will be an additional contributor to poverty. And so, the circle of social
determinants impacting on health and wellbeing turns once more.
It doesn’t have to be like this.
I’m saying hats off to the New Zealand government. Two weeks ago, they
introduced a new law that sets a steadily rising purchasing age so that today’s
young people will never be able to legally buy cigarettes. The age limit will
be raised year on year. Additionally, in the future you will only be able to buy
cigarettes from specialty tobacco stores. I have seen this approach work well
in Finland and parts of Australia with the selling of alcohol. In announcing
the new law, the New Zealand Minster for Health, Ayesha Verrall, said: ‘Our
priority in bringing this bill is protecting what is precious- our people, our
whȃnau
(families) and our communities’. As I sit here writing this, waiting to travel
back home, I have to say, Ayesha’s words resonate well with me. We do need to
keep looking for ways to promote health and wellbeing rather than continuing to
just build bigger and more expensive hospital and clinics. Prevention is always
going to be better than cure.
No comments:
Post a Comment