Yet again I travelled to London on a
Virgin train where it was impossible to connect to the wi fi. Its a situation I find extremely
frustrating. When I got to Euston (which did have free wi fi) my in-box was overflowing with the emails
and messages I could have responded to earlier. I had begun to
feel like Billy No Mates. When I later complained to Virgin Trains, I was
fobbed off with absolutely facile excuses, which I found
very patronising. It was not a particularly authentic and helpful customer
service - but perhaps this was another secret not learnt at the Business School
I was in London to participate in a Nursing Midwifery Council (NMC) Thought Leadership
Group. The group has for the last 18 months, been developing new standards for the
education and preparation of nurses. It has been an interesting experience. The
group is made up of representatives from across the 4
nations of the UK, and is composed of student nurses, clinical
practitioners, researchers, services users and educationalists from all fields of practice. We have met on a
regular basis in developing, challenging and refining each standard.
The new standards are aimed at ensuring that graduate nurses
will be fit to practice and fit for purpose in 2025. Being ‘fit for practice’ and
‘fit for purpose’ has been a long contested concept. Attempts at both
understanding what they might mean and how they might be measured have led to
many reforms in the way nurses are educated and trained in the UK. Indeed, the
work of the Thought Leadership Group is in part a response to public and
political perceptions that the current standards underpinning nurse education
today do not ‘produce’ nurses fit for either practice or purpose.
The NMC, defines fitness for
practice as: ‘being fit to practise requires a nurse or midwife to have the
skills, knowledge, good health and good character to do their job safely and
effectively’. It is a definition that reinforces their Code, which has been in force
since March 2015. It sets out what nurses need to be able to demonstrate in
order they can: prioritise people; practice effectively; preserve safety; and
promote professionalism and trust. It is a good piece of work and something the
group referred to as we developed each educational standard.
One area the group spent a great deal of time over was the notion of
the authentic nurse. This was an idea that reflected the notion that the nurse as a person had to be credible, even though they might at times be fallible and
human in the choices they made. So could a nurse who smokes really be authentic
in promoting healthy life style advice? For me the answer had to be yes. The
authentic nurse is someone who is able to draw upon their life experiences, and
psychological capacities (such as hope, optimism, resilience and self-efficacy),
and has a high degree of emotional intelligence. It is these attributes and insights of ‘self ’that enable individuals to become truly authentic.
In this sense the authentic nurse understands that they may have the knowledge (what happens when someone is having a coronary) and the knowing (how such knowledge should be used in providing treatment and care) but its in responding to the not knowing (how an individual is experiencing the heart attack) that is critical. So for me, authenticity arises from harnessing the knowledge and knowing, and that space in between - not knowing - in providing person centered care.
Unfortunately at last week’s meeting we returned to this debate for rather sad reasons. We had received some early feedback that the term ‘credible nurse’ (I lost the argument to use my preferred option of authentic) and it was suggested we revisited this element of one of the standards, as a nurse who was obese could never be credible. Now nearly 60% of men and women in the UK are either overweight or obese (as defined by a BMI over 25 and 30 respectively) – and we rank 3rd behind Iceland and Malta for having the highest rates of obesity in western Europe.
Of course some of these people are going to be nurses, and whilst being obese is perhaps not a health promoting state to be in, it doesn’t follow that they maybe any less credible as a nurse than any other person. It is a rationale and response similar to the reductionist one dimensional view that Virgin Trains provided me regarding there being no wi fi on the train. I hope as the new standards go out for wider consultation in a few weeks time, that the responses we receive from the profession and the public are a little more authentic in their challenge.
In this sense the authentic nurse understands that they may have the knowledge (what happens when someone is having a coronary) and the knowing (how such knowledge should be used in providing treatment and care) but its in responding to the not knowing (how an individual is experiencing the heart attack) that is critical. So for me, authenticity arises from harnessing the knowledge and knowing, and that space in between - not knowing - in providing person centered care.
Unfortunately at last week’s meeting we returned to this debate for rather sad reasons. We had received some early feedback that the term ‘credible nurse’ (I lost the argument to use my preferred option of authentic) and it was suggested we revisited this element of one of the standards, as a nurse who was obese could never be credible. Now nearly 60% of men and women in the UK are either overweight or obese (as defined by a BMI over 25 and 30 respectively) – and we rank 3rd behind Iceland and Malta for having the highest rates of obesity in western Europe.
Of course some of these people are going to be nurses, and whilst being obese is perhaps not a health promoting state to be in, it doesn’t follow that they maybe any less credible as a nurse than any other person. It is a rationale and response similar to the reductionist one dimensional view that Virgin Trains provided me regarding there being no wi fi on the train. I hope as the new standards go out for wider consultation in a few weeks time, that the responses we receive from the profession and the public are a little more authentic in their challenge.
No comments:
Post a Comment