I loved reading about Lily and Margot’s story last week. This
was the story of two blue-throated macaws, who decided to go on a bit of a
six-day jolly and get away from the hustle and bustle of London Zoo. Lily and
Margot fly freely each day, but always return home to their enclosure at the
end of the day. On the 21st October, they decided to just keep
going. Eventually, they were found in a back garden 60 miles away. Reading the
story, I couldn’t help but wonder if Lily and Margot had actively planned their
trip, or whether it was a spur of the moment decision. Parrots are quite
capable of coming up with a cunning plan and they have the patience of Job when
it comes to getting what they want. So, I wondered if they had simply decided
they needed a bit of a change, worked out how to do it, and away they went. However,
once the zookeepers arrived to try and catch them, Lily and Margot simply flew
to the keepers and tucked straight into their fruit and nut treats. I’m sure
they knew they were safe once more.
I can speak from many years’ experience, as to how parrots
operate. Our parrot, Billy, is well over 35 years old now. He has lived with me
for all that time. Whilst he is not as pretty as Lily and Margot, he is super intelligent.
He is a brilliant mimic, has a fabulous repertoire of words and phrases, but most
all is totally aware of context, mood and presence. If he sees J and I hug, he
makes the kissing sound even before we kiss. If he hears the front door open,
he will say ‘see you later’. If he sees me walking into the kitchen with a
bottle of wine, he will make the sound of the screw cap coming off and the
sound of wine being poured into the glass. His favourite music is the blues and
he will sing and whistle along to the blues for hours.
Over the years he has changed. When I first got him, he liked to fly about the house, but my goodness, he was destructive. I remember once coming home to find he had flown onto my bookcase, and had systematically stripped all the spines from most of the books. So, I started to clip one of his wings, but this was a real trauma for him and for me. Eventually, I stopped doing this, bought a much larger cage, and he has lived happily in this for the last few years. These days, Billy doesn’t try to escape, even when his cage door is wide open and I’m cleaning him and his cage. It is his secure place.
One of the other ways he has changed is in his acceptance of
change. For many a year, if I went away from home for a week or more, when I came
back, he would go into a sulk and not speak nor interact for a number of days.
Billy would literally turn his back on me and I would be ignored. He would
eventually thaw, but it could take a while. These days he doesn’t seem to mind
at all and always greets me with a ‘hello Billy’ and a cry of exclamation –
like ‘where have you been?’ He doesn’t bear a grudge at all, unlike crows apparently.
John Marzluff, a professor from the University of Washington,
has studied crows for over 17 years. His research has shown how crows bear
grudges against folk, who they feel have upset or threatened them. Even after
many, many years, crows will attack those who they remember harming them, if they
see them again. It seems to me that there might be many folk, who display the
same behaviour. Last week I came up against three people like that. They
appeared to be out to seek revenge for harm that had happened to them and/or their
loved one, and harm that had occurred many years ago. Unlike with crows, I
happened to be the person in the firing line albeit, I hadn’t directly caused
them harm. My sin was simply to work for an organisation that, in their experience,
had.
Now for as far back as I can remember, and certainly as a
therapist and manager, I have tried to practice unconditional positive regard. Carl
Rogers’ concept is easy to understand, but difficult to always put into
practice. In a therapeutic sense, it requires the therapist to have a complete
and non-judgemental acceptance in caring for and supporting their client, regardless
of whatever the person says or does in the therapeutic interaction. Positive
regard is not withdrawn even if the person does something, or says something that
challenges the therapist’s sense of self.
Last week I experienced a similar challenge (and threat) to
my sense of self from a number of different folk. Whilst I no longer seek or
receive supervision, I’m thankful to have several very supportive colleagues. Along
with the always listening ear of J, their support makes a difference and helps
me maintain that sense of unconditional positive regard for those folk, who
appear to want to harm me. Their support, and attentive listening, collectively
helps provide me with my own secure space. Like Lily and Margot, at the end of the
day, last week, I was grateful to tuck into their hypothetical fruit and nut
treats.
If you take the mantle of attempting to lead a damaged and very broken Trust, you need to be able to separate the personal from the professional. Having been the recipient of similar abuse following the Panorama broadcast when I had no direct patient interaction I do relate to the feelings you describe. It’s hard but you need to reference their ire with the highly publicised abusive treatment of patients. I don’t need to explain to you the vulnerability of mentally ill patients. The abuse you and I receive which stems from that - we can walk away from and as you say, seek validation and affirmation from peers. They did/do not have this luxury.
ReplyDeleteI urge you to not fall in to the trap of those who have walked before you and make this about you. If becoming Chair was a vanity project, where you envisaged swooping in and saving the day, GMMH is not the place for you. Egos, reputation and ‘it wasn’t me, guv’-type attitudes need to be left at the door. As hard as it is, listen to those who are threatening your sense of self because you have the power to make real, sustainable change and they are the key to unlocking the whole sorry state of affairs. However, if you just want your ego massaging, maybe stick with the parrots.