Last week, aided and abetted by
Hansel and Gretel, our two goats, the chickens made a bid for freedom. Their
foray into the big wide world was short-lived however, and they were soon back
in their run. The hens spend much of the winter in a large covered run, which
protects them from the worst of the weather and helps the garden area, they
usually run around in, to recover. For the last couple of weeks, they have been
eyeing up the rapidly appearing green shoots of the returning grass with
something reminiscent of circling hyenas waiting to steal some of a lion’s
kill.
Worryingly the virus has started
to jump to other animals, cats, foxes, sea lions, cows and even humans too.
Last week it was reported that a man in Texas had caught bird flu from contact
with a cow. Thankfully, to date, there is no evidence to suggest that the virus
can be spread from one person to another. Globally, there have been 887
reported cases of bird flu infecting people. 462 of these folk died as a consequence
of the infection. It is potentially a hundred times worse than Covid which, at
the start of the pandemic in 2020, saw something like 20% of those infected sadly
dying. There is no human bird flu vaccination available.
Interestingly, with echoes of the
Covid pandemic, the UK government issued guidance last month that we should all
stay 2 metres away from wild birds. I have warned the little robin, who comes looking
for worms and watches me as I work in the garden. Whilst somewhat humorous as a
piece of government advice, not all requirements regarding hens are as funny.
From October this year, anyone keeping chickens will be required to register
the birds with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)
and apply for a holding number. We already do something similar for our goats
and J is, to her delight, registered as a “hobby farmer”. I’m not sure how the
new regulations will be effectively policed. However, it is an administrative
burden, in both time and cost, that will see many back garden hen keepers give
up their birds.
The new regulatory burden is
nominally designed to control bird flu. However, most responsible poultry
keepers will ensure their hens are protected from contact with wild birds, who
may carry the virus, in the same way as ours have been over the winter months. Indeed,
last year when there was an outbreak locally, we had to keep our hens in splendid
isolation for several months. Despite their covered run being large and
spacious, towards the end of their confinement, they did start to get a little
techy and were clearly upset they couldn’t run free, as they normally would
during the summer.
Do hens suffer because of their lives
being disrupted in this way? Well, the evidence from our small flock would suggest
they do and they don’t. Some of our hens are two or three years old (with the
exception of chicks hatched that are male, we don’t kill them) and they are
quite familiar with the winter/summer cycle and only start to become twitchy,
as the days get longer and there’s more sunlight. Yet when they were kept isolated
during the summer, they clearly began to get upset. Last week, I heard an interesting
discussion around the same topic.
Most days, I like to listen to Farming
Today, a Radio 4 programme that airs at 05.45 during the week. Last week,
there was a debate about the banning of poultry cages in the UK. These were not
the horrible cruel small metal cages used in industrial scale egg production.
Those were thankfully banned in 2012. Enriched cages were introduced and it is
these that the UK government now want to ban. Enriched cages are much larger,
have perches, scratching areas and proper nest boxes for the hens to lay their eggs.
There were two elements to the discussion that resonated. One was the farmer
being asked if he thought the hens suffered by living in these cages. His
response was the hens knew no other existence, so he didn’t see how they could
suffer. It was a statement that has made me ponder all week, but it feels a little
like a metaphysical conundrum probably only Nietzsche might untangle, and we
can’t do it here.
The second element was the farmer’s
complaint that such decisions and changes in policy were made by folk in Whitehall,
who, likely, would never have visited a poultry farm, would not be able to describe
what an enriched cage looked like, and who probably would have a stab at
the philosophical question of suffering. Not that I would want to intentionally
draw parallels, but next week I’m to attend two regulatorily reviews of our
Trust, which will be conducted by folk who likely, have never nursed someone experiencing
severe mental distress, or run a ward for acutely ill service users, or had to ensure
safe and quality services are consistently provided within finite and often
shrinking financial resources. However, just like our chicken run, we have
plenty of green shoots (of improvement) that I will be happy to share and
hopefully, others will recognise too.
No comments:
Post a Comment