I knew last week was going to be
a busy one. Not that it was a bad busyness mind, just full on. I took the 128-mile
round trip into Manchester every day, and on different days I drove through
rain, ice, frost and high winds, with every trip undertaken in the dark. Such journeys
are an unanticipated consequence of making the decision nearly three years ago to
accept the Chair’s role at Stockport NHS FT. I knew it was always going to be a
long journey at each end of the day, but as I had taken up the post in Spring,
I hadn’t given much thought to how much more difficult travelling in Winter would
turn out to be. That said, I have enjoyed every moment I get to spend with my
Stockport NHS health family.
It was the sociologist Robert
Merton, who was credited with introducing the concept of unanticipated consequences.
He described these as actions taken that have both intended and unintended consequences.
We often plan, based on what we believe the intended consequences will deliver.
Unintended consequences are often more difficult to recognise or anticipate. Of
course, unintended consequences can be both positive and negative,
I guess many readers will know
that the discovery of penicillin was the result of an unintended consequence. Alexander
Fleming’s original research was into treating the flu virus. Following a Summer
break from his laboratory, he returned to discover a mould in one of his
culture dishes. It was a ring of mould, within which there were no bacteria
growing. Quite by accident, he had discovered the world’s first early form of
antibiotic. His discovery revolutionised medicine. However, as we know today,
the overuse of antibiotics, particularly to treat illnesses where an antibiotic
wouldn’t make a difference to the person’s recovery, has led to widespread antibiotic
resistance.
Last week, I read of another
accidental medical discovery that, in its own way, has also been revolutionary.
It was an advertisement for one of the many BBC shows on offer this Christmas. The
film is called Men Up, and tells the story of the discovery of an
unintended consequence of testing the drug Sildenafil, perhaps better known now
as Viagra. The drug was being tested to measure its impact on the condition angina,
with a group of ex-coalminers in Merthyr Tydfil, Wales. It was one of the trial nurses, who asked the trial
participants whether they had noticed any side-effects from taking the drug. Apparently,
they were all reluctant to answer, but eventually, one of the men said that he
had been experiencing ‘robust’ erections during the night. All the other men eventually
admitted they had all experienced similar side effects.
It is perhaps to be remembered that
back in the early 1990s such conversations were likely to be rather difficult, talking
about sex and bodily functions wouldn’t have come easy. Realising there might
be other uses for the drug, the angina research was abandoned and a small-scale
study was undertaken with a group of men in Bristol struggling with impotence.
This small-scale study was a great success. Indeed, the participants, who had
been given a small supply of the tablets and told to return any they didn’t
use, refused to return any of their tablets.
Ironically, and somewhat sadly, whilst
the discovery of Viagra came about through an unintended consequence of testing
the drug, there are a number of unintended consequences of the drug in use; one
of which has been an increase in sexually transmitted diseases. Apparently,
many older men ‘tested’ the drug by visiting sex workers. Likewise, there has been
an increased number of older men abandoning their wives for younger women. I
say sadly, as I wonder whether these outcomes might have been anticipated, and
as such perhaps avoided.
Last week, there was another story
which I felt told of another apparent unintended consequence, but one that
might also have been avoided. I’m referring, of course to the much-heralded
successful pay dispute resolution for consultant doctors. Well, it was much heralded
by the likes of the Daily Mail, but the reality is that the deal offered is so complicated
that even the BMA cannot recommend consultants accept it. Sorting out the pay claim
of the highest paid members of the healthcare workforce first just doesn’t seem
a sensible thing to do. Already we now face the disruption of junior doctors
taking further industrial action. I am fairly sure that nurses won’t be far
behind. If further industrial action happens, the unintended consequence will
be an increased busyness for all health and care provider organisations, most
of whom are already struggling to meet an ever-increasing demand for healthcare.
Unlike my last week, such busyness won’t be so good for folk to deal with.
No comments:
Post a Comment