Last week left me struggling to
describe the collective experience we witnessed as events unfolded at
Westminster. I felt my descriptive lexicon was totally exhausted. Mayhem,
havoc, chaotic, humiliating, confusion, toxic and very, very sad. These are all
the words that come to mind when I think about the last few weeks in UK politics.
My sadness is for the country and what has been done to our way of life. I've also felt increasingly sad for Liz Truss’s husband, Hugh.
As sometimes happens, when I look
at individuals for background information for my blogs, I am often surprised by
the connections with my world. Hugh O’Leary’s mother was a nurse, and his father
was a lecturer. He went to the London School of Economics, where he met Therese Coffey, our current Secretary of State for
Health and Social Care (SoS).
I cannot begin to imagine the
stress the pair of them have been under. Standing by his wife, which he has
done on a previous occasion, but in different circumstances, would have been incredibly
difficult. I take my hat off to him. His dignified and solid support for Liz is
to be applauded. However, to be clear, I’m appalled by the damage she has
wrought on the UK during her brief time as Prime Minister. As someone said last
week, what has happened is unforgivable and we should never forget this time.
Her behaviour was wrong on so
many levels. As are her plans to allow pharmacists to dispense antibiotics without
the need of a GP prescription in order to reduce demands on GP practices. Her proposal
was condemned by many health care professionals. Professor Stephen Baker, a
Cambridge University international expert in molecular microbiology and anti-microbial
resistance, described the proposals as ‘moronic’. He added that widening
access to drugs in this way was dangerous. The overuse of antibiotics
contributes to the emergence of drug resistant bacteria, and reducing the unnecessary
prescribing of antibiotics has long been a central plank of UK public health policy.
In any event, pharmacists can already
prescribe and dispense prescription-only medicines in some limited emergency circumstances.
Likewise, other pharmacists who have undertaken further training, can practice
as a pharmacist independent prescriber. Like doctors and Advanced Nurse Practitioners,
with prescribing rights, they are able to prescribe medication for any
condition they’re clinically competent in. Actually, both have been able to do
this since 2006, when Patricia Hewitt was SoS for Health. The approach was
introduced as a way of reducing pressure on GP practices. I have used this
service when my repeat prescription medication is up for review, and my pharmacists
has always been able to independently change my medication as necessary. I have
always felt to be in safe hands.
And whilst I don’t want to be
accused of hounding Dr Feelgood, her ultra-libertarian ideology doesn’t make me
feel that the UK’s health care system, or me personally, is in safe hands. My favourite
philosopher, Michel Foucault, when talking about the relationship between the
State and healthcare argued that a doctor’s first task, before seeing the patient, and providing a diagnosis and treatment, is a political one. He suggested that
doctors must first ‘begin with a war against bad government’. So, I make
no apologies for speaking truth to power in my criticism of the proposed
changes to current UK health care policy. I’m not the only one either.
You may well have seen Dr Dan
Poulter’s stinging challenge last week, where he described Dr Feelgood’s
hostility to what has often been referred to as the ‘nanny state’. Dr
Poulter is well qualified to challenge the Dr Feelgood approach. He is a Conservative
MP, an NHS doctor and someone who served as health minister in the coalition government
(2021-2015). It seems Dr Poulter’s motivation for calling out the SoS was her
opposition to banning adults from smoking in cars containing children – even though
this practice was made illegal in 2015. Dr Feelgood is a smoker and has long opposed
any restrictions on smoking. Making it clear that she wants to scrap previous measures
to curb obesity such as the sugar tax, not introducing the smoking control plan,
and ditching the health inequalities’ White Paper feels very short-sighted and,
frankly, alarming.
More smoking and greater rates of
obesity will result in more chronic ill-health and increased pressure on the
NHS. It is also likely to result in reduced life expectancy for many, particularly
amongst the poorest groups in our communities. It seems to me that our current SoS
is choosing to ignore what I think is both an ethical and practical responsibility
of any government to tackle those known contributors to poor health. Individuals
have a responsibility for their own health for sure, but so does our government.
Foucault also observed that the impossibility of perfect health implies the impossibility
of a perfect health care system. Choices will always have to be made as to what
is practically and economically possible to provide in terms of health care. Ditching
the UK’s evidence-based public health policy doesn’t seem to be a great choice.
I live in hope, however. We are clearly
going to have a new Prime Minister by this time next week. Hopefully this will
mean a new Cabinet too. If we don’t, the mayhem will continue and again, it
will be you and I that stand to lose out once more. Given next weekend will be
full of excited children embracing Halloween, let’s hope there will be more treats
than tricks this time round.
No comments:
Post a Comment