One of the things I have been most
grateful for during my academic career was the opportunity to travel the world.
I’ve been able to visit places I might have only ever dreamt of seeing short of
winning the lottery. Teaching, research and publications were (and still are) the
currency that gave academics a voice. You really needed to be good across each
of these aspects to ensure your voice was heard by as many folk as possible. One
great opportunity to use your voice is at conferences. Prior to the pandemic,
conferences were lively gatherings where people could meet, present their research
and thinking and, of course, network. Many folk, like me, also enjoyed the
opportunity to visit foreign lands.
Often the conferences I spoke at
were those that focused upon mental health, mental illness and wellbeing. It’s
true to say that over the years I would meet some familiar faces at these
conferences, and strong, lasting friendships grew out of these regular ‘meet
ups’. One of these relationships was with a legend in mental health care –
Phil Barker. He was 20 years in front of me as an academic, and was a prolific
author and researcher. He was also a highly regarded psychotherapist and nurse.
In 1987, he became the first Professor of psychiatric nursing in the UK. I
became Professor of mental health care in 2006. This was an interesting year
for lots of reasons; more later.
Well in 2006, while staying at
Trinity College, Dublin, Phil had an epiphany. He realised that most of the
people he encountered in his work as a psychotherapist were shadowed by ‘the
ineffable’: that is a kind of intuitive understanding of what it was that
troubled them, but an inability to put it into words. The following day he
resigned his Professorship at Newcastle University. He returned to his native
Scotland and using art, began to explore the ‘ineffable’ that shadowed
his own life. Retiring from academia, Phil left behind a legacy that continues
to influence contemporary mental health care. In 2004 Phil and Poppy
Buchan-Barker (Phil’s wife) published what has become a seminal piece of work,
‘The Tidal Model: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals’. It was a
book on mental health recovery. The book drew upon almost five years of
research with his colleague Dr Chris Stevenson. At the time, it was a
significant alternative model to the prevailing psychiatric theories of care.
It emphasised how individuals living with a mental illness could benefit from
taking a more active role in their treatment and care.
There isn’t room in this blog to
explore every aspect of the Tidal Model; you can listen to a brief explanation
by Phil here, or a slightly longer version here (look out for the red clogs). Phil
defines the Tidal Model as ‘a philosophical approach to the discovery of
mental health. It emphasises helping people reclaim their personal story of
mental distress, by recovering their voice. By using their own language,
metaphors, and personal stories, people begin to express something of the
meaning of their lives. This is the first step towards helping recover control
over their lives’. Phil describes a number of key philosophical assumptions
that underpin the Tidal Model.
These are: a belief in the
virtue of curiosity; recognising the power of resourcefulness, instead
of focusing on problems, deficits, or weaknesses; respecting the
patient’s wishes instead of being paternalistic; accepting the paradox
of a crisis as an opportunity; acknowledging that all goals must belong
to the individual patient; and recognising the virtue of pursuing
elegance, the simplest possible means should be sought. Fundamentally, the
mental health professional should believe that recovery is possible. Perhaps this
sounds rather obvious, but sadly it’s not always the case.
Now you might still be wondering,
interesting as all this is, what does it have to do with the price of eggs.
Well last week I self indulgently poured myself a hot Vimto and enjoyed one of
the Guardian newspapers ‘long reads’. If you have time for a
cuppa, you can also read it here. It is a beautiful and eloquent piece written
by Gavin Francis. In nearly 20 years as a GP, he has, as a result of the
pandemic, become more aware of the concept of recovery and the individual experience
of illness and expectations of wellness. His many years of medical training
took for granted the western bio-medical approach to the body. What Gavin, like
Phil, has come to realise is that illness is not simply a matter of biology or
pathology, but also one of belief, culture, sociology and psychology. For me
there are a couple of sentences in his piece that capture the notion of
recovery so well. In Gavin’s own words: ‘All worthwhile acts of recovery
have to work in concert with natural processes, not against them… …a doctor who
sets out to ‘heal’ is in truth more like a gardener who sets out to ‘grow’ –
actually nature does almost all the work’. It seems to me, as health care
professionals, we should try and keep this in mind, as we work with our
patients and their loved ones.
And 2006. Almost the last time I
saw Phil was in 2006 in Alice Springs, Australia. It was a great conference in
lots of ways. He was a judge of the conference papers and awarded first prize to
the one that my long time writing partner, Prof Sue McAndrew and I had presented.
The story doesn’t end there. The following year, I was in Finland, attending
the public defence of one of my Finnish colleagues as part of his PhD studies. Phil, was one of the external
examiners. We raised a glass or two. These days, under the new name of Phil McLoughlin
(in honour of his grandfather), Phil has now returned to his artistic roots and
has taken up painting full time. In his own way I’m sure he is on his own path
to recovery. I believe all health care is an art. For me, the art is when to
use the science and when to let it lie.
This is without a doubt the most excellent article about the idea of having a patient requiring mental health care being given more dignity more control and motivation for wellness I've ever read. As a Critical Care RN for 33 years, in various settings, I have cared for patients with mental health diagnosis and always felt the approach could be more holistic and caring. This article covers this approach.
ReplyDelete