The blogging community is a supportive,
creative and a largely virtual community. As such, members not only post their
own blogs, but avidly follow and read fellow bloggers’ posts. For me this week was
no exception. One of my fellow bloggers is Lynn Findlay @lm_findlay . She
runs a bit, writes a bit and last week posted a blog that explored the growing
use of instant images on social media and the possible implications for privacy
and behaviour. It’s a great little blog and one of the things that I found fascinating
was Lynn’s example of contrasting the reader’s reactions and feeling to both the
use of images or the use of simple text to capture the moment and/or inform. You
can read it here.
I think Lynn is on to something.
One has only to look at the proliferation of Christmas appeals we are now
seeing on our TVs. Whether the appeal is to help provide clean water, provide
warmth and a place to stay for the homeless, rescue donkeys, cats and other
assorted animals, what they all have in common are the use of images that seek
to evoke an emotional response. And of course, following that emotional
response, to donate to the charity.
I have always used a lot of images
in my work. As an academic, my classroom presentations were predominately made
up of images that I used as a framework for delivering my lectures (and every presentation
contained at least one chicken picture); likewise, presenting papers at
conferences would always involve carefully selecting images to illustrate the
points I wanted to make.
My long-term co-writer Professor
Sue McAndrew shares my passion for surreal images and we have spent many a long
hour searching for images to illustrate our work. Our belief has been that
pictures often tell the story more powerfully, or at the very least, capture
and keep the attention of others. Over the years, we have received some great
feedback about our presentations and the images we have used. I really pleased that after some 120 peer
reviewed conference presentations made all over the world (and that is a lot of
images) we have never had a complaint that they have caused offence. However, many
people have told us of the other powerful emotions they experienced by some of the
images seen.
And I had one of those moments
last week.
I was just going through my
Twitter timeline, when I came across a picture posted by one of my Twitter
friends. It showed a picture of a sculpture in Geneva. The sculpture was
created by the Romanian artist Albert György, who now lives in Switzerland. It
can be found in a small park on the Quai du Mont Blanc promenade, situated along
the shores of Lake Geneva. He called the piece ‘Melancolie’ reflecting the
isolation and sadness he felt after his first wife had died. It is a beautiful and
evocative piece.
Interestingly, the Twitter post
had the sculpture named as ‘Emptiness’. This seems to have come from one of the
many comments posted by people who had seen it and had experienced loss, particularly
of a child. It is a recurring theme in many of the comments that have been
posted. You can find some of these here. I found many of the comments heart-breaking
in describing the context of the loss experienced, but all were powerfully demonstrating
the power of love. I am not surprised to learn that the image has been seen
over 23 million times since being shared on social media. Over the past few
days, my Twitter timeline was packed with comments around the image – and that doesn’t
always happen with many images.
The title of this week’s blog
comes from the 1971 album of the same name. This was a breakthrough album for Rod
Stewart. Like all good art, the songs have endured and been loved by
generations over the last 47 years. In its own way, many of the songs are as
poignant and evocative as Albert György’s sculpture. These are songs that talk
of forgiveness (Amazing Grace), first love found, and love lost (Maggie May),
of living for today (Tomorrow’s a long time), loss (I know I’m losing you) and
faith (Reason to believe). If you have not heard this album in a while, find 40
mins today, sit back and have a listen. What you might not know, unless you were
around in the 1970s, is that on the original album notes, the names of two alcoholic
drinks (Martell Brandy and Mateus Rose) are slipped in and listed as contributing
personnel on the album.